Dhammānupassanā Series
The Buddha taught suffering and the ending of suffering. His teachings were stringently parsimonious and practical. It made sense that he would teach us about craving the origin of suffering, because understanding those factors and internalizing their understanding through practice makes a difference in how we deal with these factors in everyday experience: we see the dangers in craving, we become dispassionate about craving, experience revulsion with regard to craving, abandon craving, and suffering ends. These are factors of phenomenal experience that we can learn to respond to directly as they arise, in more skillful ways. Such phenomena are the stuff of dhammānupassanā, examining phenomena as they arise in our experiential world through the lens of the Dhamma.
So, why would the Buddha teach biology? It appears that he had important things to say about the nature of conception in the womb, and about the composition of the psychophysical organism, and that he gave these things prominent roles at key junctures in his teachings. Or did he? Biology lies within the processes of the natural world that are largely beyond immediate experience but that generally continue to play out, at least within this life, regardless of our practice or how we might respond to them. Such things, if they are valuable at all, belong to theory and not praxis.
I don’t think the Buddha was a biologist, and hope to show this in this brief essay.
Leave a Reply