Buddhist Life/Buddhist Path: online course

January 28, 2024

baganbanner

Buddhist Life / Buddhist Path

in person and via Zoom
12 weeks 2/14 – 5/1/2024 Wednesdays 7:00 – 8:30pm Central (Chicago) Time
with Bhikkhu Cintita

Sitagu Dhamma Vihāra, Chisago City, MN USA, email BC to register and for Zoom link.

This course is based on the earliest stratum of Buddhist texts interpreted for the modern student. These astonishingly profound and coherent teachings of the Buddha span not only the higher training of meditation, psychology and the path to awakening, but also practical advice on virtue, harmony, community and basic human values. There are no prerequisites and no cost.

lifePathUseful Links:

Class home page: http://sitagu.org/cintita/lifepath/ (materials, announcements)
Sitagu Dhamma Vihara: http://www.sitagu.org/mn/ (our venue)
Bhante C’s Web site: https://bhikkhucintita.wordpress.com
Bhante C’s email: bhikkhu.cintita@gmail.com

Text:

Buddhist Life / Buddhist Path: foundations of Buddhism based on earliest sources, by Bhikkhu Cintita. Available in hard copy, or by download as PDF from class home page.

pdficon LifePathFlier

Satipaṭṭhāna Rethought

January 10, 2024

a practice guide for contemplating Dhamma

This is the one way, bhikkhus, a path for the purification of beings, for the surmounting of sorrow and lamentation, for the disappearance of pain and grief, for the attainment of the true way, for the realization of Nibbāna—namely, the four satipaṭṭhānas. (Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta, MN 10)

So begins the Buddha’s primary discourse on satipaṭṭhāna. Satipaṭṭhāna means literally “know-how-attentiveness.” It is the historical source of most contemplative/meditative traditions in Buddhism, including modern vipassanā or insight meditation, and the so-called “mindfulness” movement. It is also deeply implicated in samatha or tranquility meditation. The Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta is today perhaps the most studied early Buddhist text.

Satipaṭṭhāna describes the practice of contemplating Dhamma in terms of direct experience through a series of exercises, which are grouped under the four categories of body, feelings, mind and dhammas, giving us “the four satipaṭṭhānas.” Their purpose is to develop right view, whereby individual Dhammic teachings are verified in experience, familiarized and internalized, such that Dhamma becomes ultimately a matter of direct perception or responsiveness, leading to the attainment of “knowledge and vision of things as they are,” effectively enabling one to see through the eyes of the Buddha.

What you are reading is a meditators’ guide to satipaṭṭhāna practice, which is the result of my years-long very careful rethinking of what exactly the early Buddhists texts say about this critical teaching. The satipaṭṭhāna had confused me for a long time, for there seems to be astonishingly little in these early texts that is interpreted consistently or convincingly, and many details are generally ignored by modern teachers. It seemed to me that part of the confusion about what the satipaṭṭhāna texts say comes from a history of re-interpretation of key concepts. It has now been abundantly documented and is becoming widely acknowledged, for instance, that the meaning and role of samādhi or jhāna found in the commentaries, particularly in the seminal Visuddhimagga, contrast markedly with what is found in the early texts. Furthermore, much of the confusion around the satipaṭṭhāna seems to have resulted from attempting to reconcile multiple contrasting historical frameworks that don’t in principle cohere.

Prior to undertaking the current paper, I had drafted a handful of papers within the framework of the Rethinking Satipaṭṭhāna project, which I intend soon to consolidate into a book carrying that title. These papers are of an academic tone, analyzing the early texts in terms of etymology, functionality, coherence and cognitive consistency, in order to address the issues of interpretation. I have accordingly been test-driving Satipaṭṭhāna Rethought in my own meditation practice over the last couple of years, and encourage others to take if for a spin and to give me feedback. This guide leaves the academics behind in order to make the fruits of my research accessible to the Buddhist yogi. The Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta itself is a practice tutorial, taking the practitioner through a series of twenty-one targeted exercises. The present guide does the same, with additional explanations for the modern practitioner.

I should warn the student that there is necessarily a lot of Dhamma here, for the early satipaṭṭhāna was clearly intended to guide a detailed investigation of Dhamma teachings in terms of direct experience. Most modern methods treat Dhamma in a more cursory manner, but this is largely a twentieth-century artifact of streamlining satipaṭṭhāna in the more popular schools of the massive vipassanā movement in order to serve an enlarged spectrum of practitioners.

Principles of Satipaṭṭhāna Rethought

Satipaṭṭhāna Rethought is an interpretation based strictly of the earliest texts, with no reference to later derivatives, such as the Visuddhimagga or modern innovations. The following lists its most basic conclusions, and places it in the space of teachings based on the satipaṭṭhāna with which the reader may be familiar. These principles are justified in my Rethinking Satipaṭṭhāna writings.

(1) Satipaṭṭhāna contemplation is an open-ended extension of Dhammic “investigation” that begins with study.

“Right view” begins with a conceptual exposure to the Dhamma, acquired and remembered through hearing or (in later centuries) reading the Dhamma. This is followed by stages of reflection and contemplation, necessary to make sense of the Dhamma, and to verify it in practice. “Book learning” must necessarily precede or overlap contemplation. This makes the applicability of satipaṭṭhāna practice in internalizing Dhamma is open-ended.

(2) The Dhamma is in principle almost entirely subject to verification in terms of direct experience.

The Buddha invited us to “come and see,” and declared that the Dhamma is “experienced by the wise.” Although the Dhamma in many later schools became an abstract philosophical system, in the early texts it has for the most part a nuts-and-bolts basis in the direct “observables” of experience. The challenge of understanding these often sophisticated and obscure early teachings is not due to a deficit in in intellect, but, on the contrary, due to the difficulty of seeing through the abstractions we already presumptively and routinely impose on our understandings.

(3) Satipaṭṭhāna contemplation is a process whereby the practitioner develops skill in Dhamma by investigating, verifying and internalizing Dhamma in terms of direct experience.

Investigation here is a process of holding dhammas (Dhamma teachings) and observables side by side for verification. (However, as we will see, the dhamma of “non-self,” prominent in the sutta, is an anomalous case, which requires an modification of this technique, such that observables are expected repeatedly to fail to verify the presumed “self.”) Repeated investigation and verification internalizes dhammas so that they are woven into the fabric of experience, so that in the end Dhamma becomes how we perceive intuitively and act spontaneously in our experiential world. This process is typical of “skill acquisition” in a vast variety of areas, whereby our “know how,” at first explicit and effortful, becomes internalized as implicit and effortless. ( More about this below.)

(4) Samādhi or jhāna is integral and critical to the fulfillment of satipaṭṭhāna contemplation.

Samādhi locks in our engagement in the task of investigation, the higher jhānas (second through fourth) filter out spurious abstract conceptualizations and narratives, and samādhi is necessary to encourage insight and the internalization of intuitive understanding.

(5) The ultimate function of satipaṭṭhāna contemplation is the attainment of knowledge and vision of things as they are.

“Knowledge and vision” is the precursor of awakening.ii Through the practice of satipaṭṭhāna that we learn to see through the eyes of the Buddha. This, in conjunction with the practice of virtue, brings us close to Nibbāna.

MORE …

Non-self in Satipaṭṭhāna

September 19, 2023

RETHINKING THE SATIPAṬṬHĀNA

The seminal Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta is today one of the most studied discourses of the entire Pali canon. It serves to verify, investigate, intuit and internalize Dhamma through through contemplation of direct experience, that we may attain knowledge and vision of the way things are, and it is the historical basis of modern insight or vipassanā meditation. I intend here to show here what is rarely recognized, that the primary Dhamma teaching of concern in the first three of the four themes of satipaṭṭhāna (body, feeling, mind and dhammas) is that pivotal and most challenging teaching: non-self.

Briefly, the first three satipaṭṭānas correspond to three facets of the self as it is presumed to exist as a substantial, fixed thing. Each of the exercises within this scope challenges this presumption by demonstrating that bodily, percipient and mental evidence for the presumption is lacking, primarily through recognition the impermanence of the evidence in contrast with the presumption. It is the distinction between evidence and presumption that gives us the dichotomies referred to in “internal and external” and in “body in body.”

The three facets of the self

We will initially set aside the wide-ranging fourth satipaṭṭāna, each exercise of which takes up a recognized dhamma (Dhamma teaching) for experiential investigation and internalization. The exercises of the first three satipaṭṭhānas are quite different in that they make little or no reference to Dhamma in the exercises themselves, but rely on the common formulaic refrain that is, nonetheless rich in Dhamma. The refrain uniformly conveys the critical teaching of the three characteristics (tilakkhaṇa) of non-self, impermanence and suffering. To get a sense of the logic of the refrain, consider this passage from the Mahānidāna Suta:

Now, Ānanda, one who says: “feeling is my self” should be told: “There are three kinds of feelings, friend: pleasant, painful, and neither pleasant not painful. Which of the three do you consider to be your self?” When a pleasant feeling is felt, no painful or neither pleasant not painful feelings is felt, but only pleasant feelings. When a painful feelings is felt, no pleasant or neither pleasant not painful feeling is felt, but only a painful feeling. And when a neither pleasant not painful feeling is felt, no pleasant or painful feeling.

A pleasant feeling is impermanent, conditioned, dependently arisen, bound to decay, to vanish, to fade away, to cease – and so too is a painful feeling and a neither pleasant not painful feeling. So anyone who, on experiencing a pleasant feeling, thinks, “This is my self,” must, at the cessation of that pleasant feeling think: “My self has gone!” and the same with a painful and a neither pleasant not painful feeling. Thus whoever thinks: “feeling is my self” is contemplating something in this present life that is impermanent, a mixture of happiness and unhappiness, subject to arising and passing away. Therefore it is not fitting to maintain: “feeling is my self.” (DN 15 ii66-7).

We notice that this Mahānidāna passage considers the prospect that feeling is equivalent to the self, and argues that this is unsubstantiated. The teaching of non-self is that we presume the existence of a substantial, fixed self as an abstraction which is unsupported by the evidence, and which furthermore results in suffering. It is just as reasonable to consider that either body or mind is equivalent to the self. This explains the particular themes the first three satipaṭṭhānas: the body, feeling and the mind are three facets of this self that we presume to our detriment.

The Mahānidāna passage then considers the evidence for feeling being this presumed self and finds it wanting, primarily because whatever it is we experience as feeling is always fragmentary, situation-specific, and ever changing, that is, impermanent and lacking the substantial fixedness we presume the self to have. We could argue the same way about the body and the mind.

Now, let’s compare the Mahānidāna passage with the Satipaṭṭhāna refrain:

1. In this way he abides contemplating body in the body internally, or he abides contemplating body in the body externally, or he abides contemplating body in the body both internally and externally.
2. He abides contemplating in body the nature of arising, or he abides contemplating in body the nature of vanishing, or he abides contemplating in body the nature of both arising and vanishing.
3. Recollection that “the body exists” is simply established in him to the extent necessary for bare knowledge and proficiency.1
4. He abides independent. He doesn’t cling to anything in the world.
… That is how a bhikkhu abides contemplating body in the body.

I submit that the logic of the two passages is substantially the same: …

CONTINUE READING

A back-road tour of the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta

April 1, 2023

RETHINKING THE SATIPAṬṬHĀNA SERIES

The Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta (MN 10) describes a practice of contemplating Dhamma in terms of direct experience through a long series of exercises, which are grouped under the four categories of body, feelings, mind and dhammas. This practice is properly a development of right view, whereby individual Dhammic teachings are verified and internalized, such that Dhamma becomes ultimately a matter of direct perception, and we attain knowledge and vision of things as they are, effectively seeing through the eyes of the Buddha. This practice is properly undertaken on the basis of the previous establishment of the virtue factors of the path (resolve, speech, action and livelihood), and integrates an optimal functioning of all of the developmental (bhāvana) factors of effort, proficiency (sati) and, notably, samādhi, for that final push toward liberation.

The structure of the text

Opening. The text of the sutta begins:

Thus have I heard. On one occasion the Blessed One was living in the Kuru country where there was a town of the Kurus named Kammāsadhamma. There he addressed the bhikkhus, “Bhikkhus.”

“Venerable sir,” they replied.

The Blessed One said this:

Bhikkhus, this is the direct path for the purification of beings, for the surmounting of sorrow and lamentation, for the disappearance of pain and grief, for the attainment of the true way, for the realization of nibbāna, namely, the four satipaṭṭhānas.

The phrase ‘direct path’ is a translation of ekāyano maggo, literally ‘one-vehicle path,’ and sometimes translated as ‘only path.’ If it is the only bus to get us to where we want to go – to panoramic views, ultimately to nibbāna – this does not make satipaṭṭhāna a stand-alone practice by any means, as it is often regarded by vipassanā yogis, because we must first travel on many buses before our transfer onto that final bus. The whole noble eightfold path must be mastered to reach nibbāna. The Buddha tells us,

Then, bhikkhu, when your virtue is well purified and your view straight, based upon virtue, established upon virtue, then you should develop the four satipaṭṭhānas in a threefold way. (SN 47.3)

By analogy, pushing the garage door button might be the direct or only way to arrive at home, but is a useless exercise if we have yet to drive across two states, deal with restless children and tank up multiple times before we reach a point where the garage door will actually respond to pressure from our thumb.

MORE …

This paper is part of a series on Rethinking Satipaṭṭhāna.
Please click HERE for references and for access to other papers in the series.

How “mindfulness” got mislabeled

February 28, 2023

RETHINKING THE SATIPAṬṬĀNA SERIES

By 1881 the scholar T.W. Rhys Davids had found the optimal translation for the Pali word sati. Previous scholars had variously tried translating or defining it as ‘remembrance,’ ‘memory,’ ‘recollection,’ ‘thinking of or upon,’ ‘calling to mind,’‘active state of mind,’ ‘fixing the mind strongly upon any subject,’ ‘attention,’ ‘attentiveness,’ ‘thought,’ ‘reflection,’ ‘consciousness,’ ‘correct meditation.’ Most of them seem to have understood that the root of the noun sati was ‘memory,’ and that the Buddha explicitly defined it that way himself, but were clearly dissatisfied given the subtle ways it interacted with other factors of Dhamma.

In his 1881 work Rhys Davids explains his choice of ‘mindfulness,’ giving a nod to ‘memory,’ but then drawing attention to the common co-occurance of sati with sampajaññā, which he translated as ‘watchfulness.’ What he seems to have intended with ‘mindfulness’ has been described as “a faculty of active memory, adept at calling to mind and keeping in mind instructions and intentions that will be useful on the path.”

That was then and this is now. Unfortunately the felicitous marriage of sati and ‘mindfulness’ did not survive the contingencies of the twentieth century. One hundred and twenty-five years later, the Buddhist scholar B. Alan Wallace emailed the scholar-monk Bhikkhu Bodhi, “As you well know, in the current Vipassanā tradition as it has been widely propagated in the West, sati is more or less defined as ‘bare attention,’ or the moment-to-moment, nonjudgmental awareness of whatever arises in the present moment. There is no doubt that the cul­tivation of such mindfulness is very helpful, but, strangely enough, I have found no evidence in traditional Pāli, Sanskrit, or Tibetan sources to support this definition of sati (smṛti, dranpa).” Little remained of Rhys Davids’ original intent, which had been grounded in the earliest scriptures.

MORE …

This paper is part of a series on Rethinking Satipaṭṭhāna.
Please click HERE for references and for access to other papers in the series.

Samādhi springs up

January 31, 2023

rethinking the satipaṭṭāna series

Samādhi or jhāna is the meditative state, an attribute of mind (samāhita citta), recommended in the early texts. It arises with the delight in engagement in a task requiring utmost skill, as the mind centers itself fully around the competence and attentiveness required for that skill, and yet slips into an almost trance-like state of stillness and composure. Just when one would expect every cognitive capacity to be fully engaged, there is in samādhi a withdrawal from thinking and deliberation, even a withdrawal from personal engagement as the performance of the task seems to continue of its own accord.

buddhaSamādhi is an anomaly for most of us in the way a human mind is supposed to work, and yet there it is. Accounting for it has caused endless confusion among modern scholars and teachers, many simply attributing mysterious or mystical powers to it, others viewing it as superfluous in Buddhist practice. Yet the weight given to this quite state in the early texts cannot be overlooked. It holds the prominent place as the ultimate factor of the noble eightfold path, it is declared to consolidate all previous factors on the path and to be indispensable in the early texts for the highest attainments: knowledge and vision, and liberation.

When right samādhi does not exist, for one failing right samādhi, the proximate cause is destroyed for knowledge and vision of things as they really are. (AN 10.3)

There is no jhāna for one with no wisdom, no wisdom for one without jhāna. But one with both jhāna and wisdom, he’s on the verge of nibbāna. (Dhp 372)

What is often overlooked is the spontaneity and pervasiveness with which samādhi arises in the early texts. Often regarded as an isolated and refined practice, we actually find that it arises of itself in practice contexts of every sort: when reciting ancient texts, when engaged in virtuous activities, when reflecting on the triple gem, and with the contemplation of the Dharma, as in satipaṭṭhāna.

In this paper we want to look at the conditions under which samādhi arises, to try to understand what is going on psychologically in samādhi, and to try to get an idea of how it is able to fulfill the almost miraculous functions attributed to it in the early texts. We also hope to account for its relationship to other aspects of Buddhist practice, in particular satipaṭṭhāna. I hope we will thereby contribute to a full understanding of this remarkable multifaceted culminating factor of the noble eightfold path.

MORE …. (pdf)

Introduction to Buddhism via Zoom

January 27, 2023

ON LINE CLASS

Buddhist Life/Buddhist Path

an intoduction to Buddhism
Sundays 3:00-4:30 pm CST (Chicago time)

Starts Jan. 29

front050217A 12-week course on the fundamental concepts of Buddhism based on the earliest sources. We will use Bhikkhu Cintita’s book Buddhist Life/Buddhist Path as a text, which is available as download or hard copy. Copies are also available at the Sitagu Buddhist Vihara in Austin and the Sitagu Dhamma Vihara in Minnesota. Please join us. You’ll learn a lot about early Buddhism. Join us, you’ll learn a lot about Buddhism.

ZOOM LINK

The Satipaṭṭhāna Method

November 19, 2022

rethinking the satipatthana series

[revised 1/30/2023] Suppose you want to do something really well, maybe wash the dishes, ride a bicycle, write a report, identify the birds feeding in your back yard, play a tune. What mental resources do you require? First, you need to bring the relevant knowledge and skills to bear; they are always there, even for the simplest task. Second, you need to be very attentive to the circumstances in which you are performing the task. Third, since you want to do the task really well, you need to muster attention and concern to bear on the task. Fourth, you need to let go of all distractions to your attention and concern.

termChart

What I have described is what I call the ‘satipaṭṭhāna method.’ It is a method that when developed and cultivated turns into the skill of doing things skillfully. Learning this skill is critical to Buddhist practice. The Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta goes beyond the method: it outlines a fourfold practice task, along with this four-factored method which is applied in the performance of that task:

Here, bhikkhus, a bhikkhu abides contemplating the body in the body, ardent, clearly comprehending, and recollective, having put away covetousness and grief for the world. He abides contemplating feelings in feelings, ardent, clearly comprehending, and recollective, having put away covetousness and grief for the world. He abides contemplating mind in mind, ardent, clearly comprehending, and recollective, having put away covetousness and grief for the world. He abides contemplating phenomena in phenomena, ardent, clearly comprehending, and recollective, having put away covetousness and grief for the world.
(MN 10 i56)

. . .  MORE: SatipatthanaMethod

Rethinking the Satipaṭṭhāna

March 18, 2022

buddha

A podcast series on
the Establishment of Mindfulness
Bhukkhu Cintita
starts Friday, March 18

Find it HERE

Talks on Samādhi

February 4, 2022

The following is another series of talks that has appeared in my two-year-old podcast series, found on the audio and video page and many podcast hosts.

SamadhiBuddha


4. Samadhi and right view (2/2). How is it possible to develop knowledge and wisdom based on right view from within samadhi? This is the art of balancing vipassana with jhana.


3. Samadhi and right view (1/2). The attainment of wisdom attributed to samādhi is generally called knowledge and vision. However, the question remains controversial how knowledge and vision are related to right view, i.e., to Dharma, for how can understanding of something cognitively complex be brought into the stillness of samadhi?


2. Pleasurable abiding in samadhi. Pleasurable abiding in the progressively unfolding factors of delight, tranquility and samaadhi is a karmic fruit that we enjoy when we are engaged in wholesome practice of all kinds. It has the important function of informing our practice of the difference between worldly and suprmundane pleasure.


 1. The context of samadhi. Far from the common characterization of samadhi (concentration) as a difficult and specialized practice of samatha, what we find in the Suttas is that samadhi arises quite spontaneously in a wide variety of practice contexts. It is a rather bread-and-butter factor in Buddhist practice.